Discrimination in Government Service
November 18th, 2008Discrimination in Government Service
Penang Deputy Chief Minister II, P Ramasamy, made a Ministerial reply in the Penang Assembly that UMNO policies have adversely affected the participation of many Malaysians in government.
P Ramasamy said that “UMNO marginalisation is so severe that non-Malays have become insignificant in public administration”.
Blaming UMNO for engineering the marginalization, he said the UMNO’s monopolisation of power through a divide-and-rule policy, has divided the people and marginalised minorities, especially in the public sector.
He had figures to support him. According to P Ramasamy, 82 percent of the public sector in multicultural Penang is dominated by Malays. The state’s public administration and statutory bodies are 92 percent and 72 percent Malay respectively.

Unless the figures are wrong, what is the fuss about a police report against P Ramasamy? The police report by the UMNO leader must be interpreted as an intimidation tactic to stifle his voice.
In any event, P Ramasamy was not questioning the special privileges of the Malays.
There can be no doubt that there is ethnic and gender imbalance in the civil service in this country. That is the reason why the Government has indicated that it will take measures to reduce the imbalance. Whether it will or not is a different matter. For now, at least there is an acknowledgment that something must be done to rectify the ethnic and racial imbalance.
If the Government is fair, it should take measures to rectify racial and gender discrimination in both public and private sectors.
Penang must take the lead, now that the multiracial Penangites have mandated the Pakatan Rakyat with change in governance.
All policies implemented by the Government of the day ought to be fair, bearing in mind that it had been proven by the March 2008 general elections that the people hold the power to change the Government.
The New Economic Policy (NEP), for instance, has been criticized for decades. No one in his right mind would question more equitable distribution of wealth or reduce the disparity between the rich and the poor. However, it is ridiculous that the NEP only spins out the super rich and the super poor, resulting in widening the gap between the rich and the poor. The results of the NEP is that the rich are getting richer; the poor poorer.
Najib made a good point last month, saying that the NEP may have to be reviewed. But in the political system called Malaysia, even the “wisdom” of Najib, despite being the Deputy Prime Minister, means little. He was immediately put under pressure. He did not go very far due to the immediate opposition from within UMNO and the Malays. Hence, he had to tone down.
Today, an SMS from The Star reported Najib as saying that the Government is open to liberalizing its policies but it has to be done at a pace that Malaysia is comfortable with.
This statement is self-serving, redundant and superfluous. What is meant by “at a pace that Malaysia is comfortable with”? If there are dissentients like Mahathir, or voices of dissent from UMNO, would the NEP or any other policy, be reviewed or liberalized?
Maybe the no-nonsense approach is to let the people be the boss of their own destiny. If the Government continues to implement policies which are discriminatory, the people must change the Government. The yearning for change shown in the 308 election cannot be ignored.
Statistics for the Sarawak public service sector are hard to come by though the DAP wakil rakyat had asked for answers. I am sure all will be keen to make comparison with Penang.
I believe that employment at the public service sector must reflect the racial composition of the state.
18/11/2008






